|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Wlodzimierz ABX Skiba wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> this way you get another level of abstract but instead of 4 dbl you must
> remember pointer to parent - is it worth ?
>
Probably not in this case, but for a complex CSG it could be useful, just
imagine a lot of macro generated trees...
I know this is probably quite difficult to implement, but NTL it would
offer interesting possibilities.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |